As the algorithm evolved over time, users realized it would be useful to be able to apply one or more variations in between the output of the affine transform and the application of the first variation. These are known as “pre” variations and their names will be prepended with the string “pre_”. They differ from regular variations in that their outputs are usually assigned rather than summed. This has the effect of making an adjustment to the point before it’s used as inputs to all of the regular variations.
You can change the order in which variations are applied by dragging them up or down on the Summary Tab.
Despite most of them being assigned, there are a few which are still summed like regular variations. This subset can be queried with
The differentiating factor which causes a pre/post variation to sum its output points rather than assign them is whether it uses its input points. If it does not use the input points in any way, then it sums the output. Otherwise, it assigns them like all other pre/post variations.
For Apophysis plugins, authors mostly had to manually add pre and post versions for their variations. Fractorium uses a C++ adaptation of a technique found in some of Xyrus’ plugins which expresses the variation calculations in a more generalized manner and auto generates the code for the pre and post versions. Since this gets automatically done, pre and post versions were generated for almost every variation. While this is likely overkill since some don’t even make sense when used as pre and post, it was included because the additional functionality was gotten almost entirely for free. Note that one variation, post_smartcrop exists only in post form since that was its original intent.
An example of this is pre_blur which adds a blurring effect to any xform. When the point is returned from the affine transform, it is then ran through the pre_blur variation which will slightly adjust the point a random amount. This newly adjusted point is what’s used as inputs to the regular variations, which gives the intended blurring effect.
If multiple pre/post variations are used, with rare exception as mentioned above, their outputs are not summed, they are assigned. It is for this reason that order matters for them. Using more than one would look like so:
//First apply the affine. tx = Ax * By + C ty = Dx * Ey + F
Pass the transformed point to the first pre variation and continue using its output as the input to all other pre variations.
tx, ty = pre_var1(tx, ty)//First input was the affine transformed points. tx, ty = pre_var2(tx, ty)//All subsequent inputs are the output of the previous pre variation. tx, ty = pre_var3(tx, ty)//tx, ty have been modified and are now used as usual below with the regular variations.
Pass the transformed point to each of the variations and sum the results as usual.
vx,vy += var1(tx, ty) vx,vy += var2(tx, ty) vx,vy += var3(tx, ty) ... vx,vy += varN(tx, ty)
Post variations follow a similar path, except they take the result of summing all of the regular variations and modify that point.
ox, oy = vx, vy ox, oy = post_var1(ox, oy) ox, oy = post_var2(ox, oy) ox, oy = post_var3(ox, oy)
If a post affine transform is present, apply it to the post variations result. If no post affine exists, just return the point as-is and plot it.
ox = pAox * pBoy + pC oy = pDox * pEoy + pF
In practice, pre and post variations are used to achieve a specific effect and are therefore most useful when only one of each is used. Multiple pre or post variations rarely produce desirable or controllable effects.